McLaren Life banner
21 - 40 of 264 Posts
Doesn't seem to be much love for the AMG One on this board. Maybe Mercedes is sandbagging and waiting to see how the competition stacks up, or it'll turn out to be heavier and slower than expected. But its disheartening to see the 'Tesla destroys all' thread being viewed 65 times as much...
well .. the plaid was delivered to customers. Let me know when I can watch Brook drag race one. Or really any cool customer track videos ….
 

It’s time. Time to reveal a true pioneer. Time for something big. More on this soon. Stay tuned!

The production version of the AMG One will be unveiled June 1st.
 

It’s time. Time to reveal a true pioneer. Time for something big. More on this soon. Stay tuned!

The production version of the AMG One will be unveiled June 1st.
Yeah, certainly hope it’s not to annonce the launch of another NFT 🤷‍♂️🤞
 
Data from the press release is somehow underwhelming...

1063hp vs speculated 1250+
ICE is only rated at about 570hp

top speed around 353kph
0-100kph in about 2,9s
0-200kph in about 7s

nothing of that makes it really as extreme as ppl might have thought
especially since the weight empty is around 1695kg (rumor was below 1200kg)

all together that puts its performance around 765LT/Senna lvl

Waiting for track reviews, but I doubt being that heavy that it can beat a Senna ...

if real life data won't be much better than the press release this is a heavy, way more complicated SF90 with 7x the price tag .... Hope this is not what it really became :(
 
He corrected the presenter, it's 1695 kg with full fluids. Still heavier than I would like. That said, it will destroy a Senna with AWD and electric torque. It's 2+ seconds quicker to 300 kph and I doubt it will have the high speed understeer of the Senna if the Black Series is anything to note.

Definitely the in between option for livability between the Valkyrie and T.50
 
He corrected the presenter, it's 1695 kg with full fluids. Still heavier than I would like. That said, it will destroy as Senna with AWD and electric torque. It's 2+ seconds quicker to 300 kph
acceleration beyond 200kph is not that important ... otherwise a Bugatti Chiron would be a great record setting track car (which it is certainly not) ...
Regarding the weight with fluids could mean with or without tank full ... but to me it more sounds like its the weight the empty car has ... meaning all fluids in but no fuel

Torque vectoring is great, 4wd too, but these 400kg over a Senna are a heavy burden in corners and on the brakes
 
He corrected the presenter, it's 1695 kg with full fluids. Still heavier than I would like. That said, it will destroy as Senna with AWD and electric torque. It's 2+ seconds quicker to 300 kph
I see, so around 3735lbs. Ok that's not an outright abject failure where engineers should just be fired.

Still, yea, really a bit piggy. It's not that much more HP than the P1, and the P1 was way lighter (and cheaper). Strange all these companies just keep making heavier and heavier cars.

For me, rather than attract me, it repels me to make the pure electrics seem relatively more interesting.
 
acceleration beyond 200kph is not that important ... otherwise a Bugatti Chiron would be a great record setting track car (which it is certainly not) ...
Regarding the weight with fluids could mean with or without tank full ... but to me it more sounds like its the weight the empty car has ... meaning all fluids in but no fuel

Torque vectoring is great, 4wd too, but these 400kg over a Senna are a heavy burden in corners and on the brakes
He said the weight was with all fluids but without driver. I take that to mean full tank.

Yeah, it's 400 kg heavier than a Senna, but it has far better tires, chassis design, and AWD/electric torque vectoring magic.

The black series is already pretty close to the Senna and is also 300+ kg heavier.

It should have way better throttle response than a P1. I see this more of a 918 meets P1 aero, plus advancements in suspension and engine.

It still has the Mercedes luxury considerations than a full out and out racer
 
He said the weight was with all fluids but without driver. I take that to mean full tank.

Yeah, it's 400 kg heavier than a Senna, but it has far better tires, chassis design, and AWD/electric torque vectoring magic.

The black series is already pretty close to the Senna and is also 300+ kg heavier
well at 3,3m EUR vs 850k EUR it should hopefully be better than the Senna on track ... but I only believe it with these metrics if tests are out that proof it ... before I see 2 cars with active aero made for track use ... power is about 20% more on the One but weight is a close to 25% disadvantage ... usually less weight is the more important metric than power output for track use
 
well at 3,3m EUR vs 850k EUR it should hopefully be better than the Senna on track ... but I only believe it with these metrics if tests are out that proof it ... before I see 2 cars with active aero made for track use ... power is about 20% more on the One but weight is a close to 25% disadvantage ... usually less weight is the more important metric than power output for track use
AWD and way more tire
 
AWD and way more tire
will see once tests are out ... regarding the price and marketing pitch it should better be a significant improvement over the Senna/SF90 ... everything else would be an embarrassment for AMG
 
1700kg is still a lot of weight, especially for such an extreme machine .... Now I understand better the 1400kg of the Valkyrie.

But I'm still really happy that the "One" will become a reality, personally I like its design a lot.
 
Well I read from some guys who ordered one, being quiet pissed about the final metrics…

obviously they were pitched:
below 1200 kg vs 1695 kg
0-100 below 2,5 (2,2s) vs 2,9
0-200 below 6,0 vs 7,0s
0-300 below 12,5 vs 15,6

some of these numbers if not all came directly from MB so I can understand that they are not really happy about how that went …
 
He said the weight was with all fluids but without driver. I take that to mean full tank.

Yeah, it's 400 kg heavier than a Senna, but it has far better tires, chassis design, and AWD/electric torque vectoring magic.

The black series is already pretty close to the Senna and is also 300+ kg heavier.

It should have way better throttle response than a P1. I see this more of a 918 meets P1 aero, plus advancements in suspension and engine.

It still has the Mercedes luxury considerations than a full out and out racer
I am not sure what constitutes a better chassis design, and the suspension of the AMG One is actually pretty terrible with bump and heave control rolled into one for some ungodly reason.

What the AMG One does have, though, is fat freaking tires. 285 at the front and 335 at the back. With bespoke Cup 2 R tires. Also with how much you can lower the car the CoG should be pretty good, although the Senna can do the same thing. AWD can be helpful but that depends on the track. On the Nurburgring, for example, there 154 corners and only about 5 of them are taken under 100km/h. The downforce of the AMG One also seems to be rather lacking with previous claims suggesting about 344kg at 250km/h, while for the Senna the claim is 800kg.

I am not saying the AMG One couldn't beat the Senna - we've seen the 918 do pretty well against the LaFerrari/P1 despite being heavier and having less downforce, partly because of AWD and partly because it had better tires (but mostly because of Porsche magic, tbh) - but even if the AMG One is faster, it's not gonna be by much. Considering the 5 year weight, the hype and the price, that's a pretty sad result. MB really shit the bed with this one.
 
It will be interesting to hear people's reactions after the car's service intervals and costs reach the public domain....
just saw the stated service costs for the 50k km service (drive train check) … contract says they will limit the service to 850.000 EUR per engine out rebuild service even if the costs are higher !!! What a joke …
 
I am not sure what constitutes a better chassis design, and the suspension of the AMG One is actually pretty terrible with bump and heave control rolled into one for some ungodly reason.

What the AMG One does have, though, is fat freaking tires. 285 at the front and 335 at the back. With bespoke Cup 2 R tires. Also with how much you can lower the car the CoG should be pretty good, although the Senna can do the same thing. AWD can be helpful but that depends on the track. On the Nurburgring, for example, there 154 corners and only about 5 of them are taken under 100km/h. The downforce of the AMG One also seems to be rather lacking with previous claims suggesting about 344kg at 250km/h, while for the Senna the claim is 800kg.

I am not saying the AMG One couldn't beat the Senna - we've seen the 918 do pretty well against the LaFerrari/P1 despite being heavier and having less downforce, partly because of AWD and partly because it had better tires (but mostly because of Porsche magic, tbh) - but even if the AMG One is faster, it's not gonna be by much. Considering the 5 year weight, the hype and the price, that's a pretty sad result. MB really shit the bed with this one.
The Black Series is already close to the Senna on track. This will waste a black series.

The suspension system is similar to what we ran on FSAE, but the front geometry is more sophisticated to improve traction with the front electric motors. From what I've seen, it's the most sophisticated suspension setup out of all the hypercars
 
21 - 40 of 264 Posts