anticipating with enthusiasm the launch of the P18
We'll need pictures.I'm sure I'll see one next month in Monterey.
AbsolutelyWe'll need pictures.
I find it difficult to see the point of racing-style test drives on snow and ice. After all, the coefficient of friction on snow or ice is so poor that the quality of the car and its technical tuning are actually irrelevant.
huh? The point is to test in 1. cold conditions and 2. on slick surfaces.I find it difficult to see the point of racing-style test drives on snow and ice. After all, the coefficient of friction on snow or ice is so poor that the quality of the car and its technical tuning are actually irrelevant.
I would argue that a 540S drives just as fast over a blanket of snow as a W1, provided they have the same tires fitted. The driving performance is probably more or less the same. There is certainly a difference between different drive types (rear-wheel drive, front-wheel drive, or all-wheel drive). But at McLaren, everything always goes to the rear axle. Of course, you have to test whether the technology works at the lowest temperatures. But one can safely do without this ridiculous sliding around on ice and snow.
Is it just for show? Cool pictures and videos for marketing purposes?
Help me out here, what am I missing?
probably more to do with what type of differential they had. an open diff would transmit all the power to the wheel with the least amount of resistance, i.e. the one that is already spinning... advantage with open diff is sharper turnin and less understeer.Sure, good points, makes sense.
Something else occurred to me. I used to drive BMWs a lot, 5 Series with rear-wheel drive. They were terrible in the snow. Once, I got stuck in a flat car park with my 5 Series.
Then I had two Maserati Granturismos, also with rear-wheel drive. Everyone warned me that these cars were a nightmare in winter. I can report that the Masi was far better than the 5 Series. Then I looked at the weight distribution, and everything became clear. The 5 Series had rear-wheel drive, with most of the weight on the front axle, while the Masi had rear-wheel drive with a very balanced, almost 50/50 distribution and thus significantly more weight on the rear axle. From this perspective, rear-wheel drive is not just rear-wheel drive; there are differences.