Does this include F1 operations?
“Share of loss of joint venturesDoes this include F1 operations?
Think the issue is more an execution problem than low pricing. Would like to have seen the modest (low risk) 750 introduced in 2022 rather than have the company totally committed to a new architecture (Artura) introduction. Need to manage risk.The financials need to work. For now, us McLaren owners, have been provided cars which are massively subsidized.
Not sure about that, as McLaren is not a publicly traded company their financial reporting can exclude/include elements of the McLaren Group as it chooses I guess.The artura platform isnt just a car platform is it? McLaren trophy is part of that? Or is that split out as it is officially 'Racing' @eMcL ?
Huh? In '21 they lost 6.1 million and in '22 they lost 334 million. That would appear to be doing worse.Since when is a loss "not that bad at all"?
.... we should 'pass the hat' around and 'make an offer'.... its not like it would take that much to buy them!Man they need to clean up the artura bugs so it starts to win hearts and minds and get the 750 perfect and grit it out there. They need a positive streak to just get above water and start building some buffer.
That said it’s crazy apple, or Tesla doesn’t buy them with some couch money. Mclaren really is the world leader in carbon fiber vehicles by far, and with real backing that could do soooooo much for the auto industry. I bet just going to carbon tubs alone would reduce US auto death rate rate from 35000 a year down to less than 10000. It’s a huge selling point. Particularly if you make an suv with a carbon cage.
I personally do not consider buying any sports car that doesn’t have a carbon fiber frame.
Apple and Tesla could start producing lighter and way safer cars, and Mclaren could super help there. Lightness for EV cars also helps with weight and range. And they could still hold up Mclaren as a halo brand. It’s kind of shocking no one there sees the value when Mclaren can be had so cheaply. It’s totally a peanut butter meets chocolate thing imo.
Businesses carry over losses from to year all the time. They have plenty of equity.Since when is a loss "not that bad at all"?
Tesla doesn’t care about driving experience. There are a ton of Detroit engineers who could fix their ass chassis dynamics, braking and steering to at least be like Chevy quality level. Tesla has conspicuously chosen to focus on EV range, manufacturing cost, volume, and their drag race gimmicks. Their goal is for the driver to be replaced by a robot. Which they have said.Man they need to clean up the artura bugs so it starts to win hearts and minds and get the 750 perfect and grit it out there. They need a positive streak to just get above water and start building some buffer.
That said it’s crazy apple, or Tesla doesn’t buy them with some couch money. Mclaren really is the world leader in carbon fiber vehicles by far, and with real backing that could do soooooo much for the auto industry. I bet just going to carbon tubs alone would reduce US auto death rate rate from 35000 a year down to less than 10000. It’s a huge selling point. Particularly if you make an suv with a carbon cage.
I personally do not consider buying any sports car that doesn’t have a carbon fiber frame.
Apple and Tesla could start producing lighter and way safer cars, and Mclaren could super help there. Lightness for EV cars also helps with weight and range. And they could still hold up Mclaren as a halo brand. It’s kind of shocking no one there sees the value when Mclaren can be had so cheaply. It’s totally a peanut butter meets chocolate thing imo.
🤞Businesses carry over losses from to year all the time. They have plenty of equity.
You don’t value a company solely by their year over year profit/loss as a snapshot. I’d wager 2023 will be a good year (profit) for McLaren as Artura sales are completed and 750 sales come in.