It's a very special feature that you don't see often. In the resale market, most cars, even exotics revert to the conservative set ups. The driver focused is a bit personal. It doesn't mean some one else won't want it. It's just that if you were going trade it, a dealer would be concerned that they would hold the car for a long time.
I totally agree; I don't see why McLaren can't use a larger diameter steel rotor since the space exists ? Small appearing rotors, behind open, bold looking wheels, looks a bit like some teenagers' cars I've seen.
Because larger steel rotors would be heavier and not appreciably increase braking performance.I totally agree; I don't see why McLaren can't use a larger diameter steel rotor since the space exists ? Small appearing rotors, behind open, bold looking wheels, looks a bit like some teenagers' cars I've seen.
Im not sure the Gallardo would be considered flashy anymore if you parked it next to a 12c,far too old fashioned and angular now compared to the lines of the Mclaren IMO
That is you, sir.
Sure, you're entitled to your opinion. My point is that it is against the McLaren philosophy of form following function, not the other way around.That is you, sir.
I'm buying the car as a street car, and for nothing else. So, any slight extra weight at each corner, wouldn't matter to (or, be discerned by) me whatsoever. And, since I have to look at the vehicle more than anyone else, I prefer a more uprated steel rotor diameter. Beefier looking brakes surely don't equate 'flashiness' to me. But ... everyone has their own partiality.
Sorry i have to agee,even at MSO Mclaren have said they will do anything provided it will not detract from the original performace spec,any changes would have to leave the car the same or improve its performance.
