2.76 kg (regardless of the actual size) is extremely light. Superlight wheels made from aluminum are around 7-9 Kg depending on size.Is 2.76 kg light for a wheel?
Idea and looks and performance are great,but the slightest sniff of a kerb and they must be toast ??? So for performance driving they are not going to work surely??Ooops, sorry but I think this is what you want.
http://carbonrev.com/
Looks like they make them specifically for the McLaren too.
Don't the Superlights need binning after nerfing a kerb? With the advances in cf manufacture I'd expect these wheels to be much more reliable than aluminium or magnesium. No stress fatigue for starters ( one of the major advantages of the 12c over aluminium uni-cell cars).Idea and looks and performance are great,but the slightest sniff of a kerb and they must be toast ??? So for performance driving they are not going to work surely??
The carbon wheels are subject to much more dynamic forces in terms of pressure and fluctuations in cold and hot. Depending on the resin that they use would determine how durable the wheel will be... Resin selection is key and if the resin selection degrades over time... wheels can go bye bye after a few years. The dymag wheels with the carbon barrel had inferior resin which caused flaking and eventual leakage in air...Don't the Superlights need binning after nerfing a kerb? With the advances in cf manufacture I'd expect these wheels to be much more reliable than aluminium or magnesium. No stress fatigue for starters ( one of the major advantages of the 12c over aluminium uni-cell cars).
Ok, you do need to be careful when parking, but come on, they do look the mutts.
Why would there not be fatigue in CF?With the advances in cf manufacture I'd expect these wheels to be much more reliable than aluminium or magnesium. No stress fatigue for starters ( one of the major advantages of the 12c over aluminium uni-cell cars).
.
Another issue with Superlight wheels is a reduction in high speed stability. Going lighter than the factory McLaren MP4 would not probably be an improvement IMO.
Yes true, but lighter wheels do affect high speed stability. You can feel the difference.Is that from experience, as I'd have thought the gyroscopic effect on stabilising a car would be minimal?
I've heard that losing 1kg of unsprung weight is worth many times that of sprung, particularly if it's rotating. So losing 1kg per corner could give you the same braking, accelerating and extra grip levels as losing 40kg off the body.
It has been a LONG time since I last looked at things like fatigue creep etc. IIRC then it affects plastics as well hence my question why it would not affect CF. When I say a LONG time ago I mean before everybody had a PC (or Mac) and CF was hardly used at all.All in all, you can almost say that there is no fatigue due to cyclical loading up to the limit of the elasticity.
With shocks keeping wheels contacting the ground, and downforce pushing down, lighter wheels will not affect high speed stability...Yes true, but lighter wheels do affect high speed stability. You can feel the difference.