Lambo (and I take this with a pinch of salt and pepper) says it's 3 seconds a lap faster than the Performante at Daytona. That's more than the supposed 765LT vs 720S difference at Nardo handling track.
Daytona is all about straight line performance and braking, with a few tight corners in between. It’s perhaps the worst track to benchmark these cars with. The skeptic in me wonders if Lambo chose it for a reason..... and here’s why.
This comparison tells me a few things:
1) STO has an incredible braking advantage over the Performante - due to the CCM-R brakes, stickier tires and more aero. This advantage is magnified at a track like Daytona.
2) The STO has more power than the GT3 race car. Notice they cleverly compared Daytona lap times against the GT3 (limited to 580hp per BOP regs) and not the Super Trofeo (640hp). I suspect the ST is faster around Daytona than its GT3 counterpart. Perhaps someone can confirm?
Why didn’t they benchmark lap times at a more traditional European track?
- The gap to the GT3 would have significantly widened and the gap to the Performante would have shrunk. No bueno for marketing which it seems has also been tailored to remind some of its customers that Lambo races in GT3 and has had success.... hence the “Based on a true story” tag line.