Joined
·
106 Posts
OK, I officially want one now. Thanks, BTW, for posting this thorough review!
This car is going to blow minds.
OK, I officially want one now. Thanks, BTW, for posting this thorough review!
It already did....I was blown away by how good it was when I drove it.This car is going to blow minds.
I read your lengthy review (thanks, BTW). What a day! Too much joy!It already did....I was blown away by how good it was when I drove it.
Senna isn’t pleasant on the road in the typical road car sense. Unconnected is probably the last adjective I’d used to describe the experience. The interior vibrates and buzzes, is devoid of any carpeting and the engine feels like it’s directly bolted to the tub (because it is).If track performance is of paramount consideration and yet simultaneous road driving demeanor still weighs significantly and Chris Harris' evaluations are taken seriously, purchasing a Senna would be a poor choice. In his comparison of the Senna to the 605S GT3 car, he concluded that the Senna was afflicted with copious amounts of understeer and was much slower around the track. As a road car, he opined that the Senna is " flabby and unconnected and not remotely pleasant on the road". Do owners of the Senna concur? Does this sound familiar? This seems to echo his sentiments about the 765LT.
Sounds like a blast!Senna isn’t pleasant on the road in the typical road car sense. Unconnected is probably the last adjective I’d used to describe the experience. The interior vibrates and buzzes, is devoid of any carpeting and the engine feels like it’s directly bolted to the tub (because it is).
One gets the feeling while driving that it doesn’t belong on public roads and expect to be pulled over at any moment just for how it looks.
The purpose of these cars is to bring happiness to their owners. Nothing more, nothing less.The point being made by my post is not to disparage the Senna, but to reveal that Harris seems to be repeating history with his current opinions about the 765. He opines that both the Senna and the 765 are not stellar, genuine track cars and concommitantly are not enjoyable on the road, thereby questioning their purpose.
harris is a dipshit. No road cars, then, are “good” track cars, because any cheap crap old f3 car will destroy them. And if the senna isn’t a good track car, nothing is. His new direction is of someone that’s gorged themselves on so may top meals from top restaurants (never having to had paid for them himself), that now to get a thrill he wants to tell you about the virtues of some crap shack that’s been closed down by the board of health. Pass.The point being made by my post is not to disparage the Senna, but to reveal that Harris seems to be repeating history with his current opinions about the 765. He opines that both the Senna and the 765 are not stellar, genuine track cars and concommitantly are not enjoyable on the road, thereby questioning their purpose.